Jayawardene requires rule alternate submit controversial RR vs DC sport; ‘It used to be disappointing’

Legendary Sri Lankan batter Mahela Jayawardene on Wednesday known as for a rule alternate in cricket after the RR vs DC sport in IPL 2022 grew to alter into frightening following a controversial manufacture to the match. At some stage within the game, the on-field umpires looked as if it would perchance maybe presumably hurry away out a clear waist-high fat toss, owing to which, the Delhi Capitals misplaced their different to take the match. If a no-ball had been given, DC would have required 17 runs to take off the final four deliveries, with a free hit in hand, rather then 18 runs off the final three balls.

With Rovman Powell already having smacked three sixes off the fundamental three deliveries, the Rishabh Pant-led facet had been undoubtedly within the game. On the opposite hand, with the umpires no longer having deemed the fat toss a no-ball, the Rajasthan Royals ended up winning the clash by 15 runs, thereby infuriating the DC camp.

Skipper Pant highlighted his frustration from the bench whereas one of the team’s fortify employees stormed onto the field to dispute the umpire’s choice. As a result of incident, both the captain and Amre had been charged 100% of the match rate, with the fortify employees member also getting a one-match ban for entering the pitch.

RR vs DC: Mahela Jayawardene requires rule alternate

Mumbai Indians’ coach and ICC Hall of Famer Mahela Jayawardene have known as for a rule alternate by asking there to be higher communication between the on-field umpires and the video officers for the length of a match. While talking to Sanjana Ganesan on the ICC Overview, the Sri Lankan batting chronicle defined why there wants to be a rule alternate if they’re to avoid eventualities getting frightening in such nail-biting finishes.

ICC Hall of Famer Mahela Jayawardena shares his exhaust on one of the IPL’s ideal talking functions and what would perchance maybe presumably approach next.

— ICC (@ICC) April 27, 2022

“It is one thing going forward that I judge now we have to glimpse at,” Jayawardene said, adding, “Is there an likelihood for the third umpire to glimpse at these items and represent the fundamental umpires that it is miles a provide that ought to be checked? It used to be disappointing to glimpse that have to you quit a sport and have of us approach on to the field, nevertheless I truthfully inform it used to be loyal emotions carrying over within the final over. A couple of sixes had been hit and there used to be a likelihood that doubtless the umpires did gain unfavorable. But the rules utter you would’t hurry to the third umpire to check on those things.”

As per the ICC rules, clause 21.5 states, “The third umpire shall review television replays of the bowler’s front foot landing and, if he/she is delighted that any of those three prerequisites have not any longer been met, he/she shall directly jabber the bowler’s raze umpire who shall in flip directly call and put No ball.”

On the opposite hand, since no such review is imaginable for a waist-high no-ball, Jayawardene believes it is miles a have to-have to relook the rules and probably gain some changes. It stays to be seen if the worldwide cricketing physique will gain any rule changes because the IPL 2022 incident has undoubtedly raised issues.

Related Articles

Back to top button