‘For cricketers, hand can also furthermore be conception about weapon’: Supreme Court docket on Navjot Singh Sidhu’s twin carriageway rage case

Reported By: DNA Web Team| Edited By: DNA Web Group |Source: DNA webdesk |Up previously: Would possibly well well 20, 2022, 06: 39 AM IST

The Supreme Court docket on Thursday delivered a key verdict within the 1988 twin carriageway rage case engaging Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu, sentencing him to 1 year of rigorous imprisonment. While announcing the sentence, the court said that a “hand is a weapon” when it involves a cricketer.

While hearing the plea filed by the family of the deceased sufferer, the apex court said that ‘hand can furthermore be a weapon when a cricketer or extraordinarily bodily match particular person inflicts the an identical’. The bench additional remarked that a disproportionately light punishment humiliates and frustrates a sufferer of crime when the culprit goes unpunished or is let off with a fairly minor punishment.

The apex court bench, comprising of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, sentenced Sidhu to penal complex within the 34-year-passe twin carriageway rage case, all over which an aged particular person lost his existence after being struck by the Congress leader on his head, in response to stories.

While delivering the decision, the court said, “The hand can furthermore be a weapon by itself where say a boxer, a wrestler or a cricketer or a particularly bodily match particular person inflicts the an identical. This might perchance even be understood where a blow is also given either by a bodily match particular person or to a extra extinct particular person.”

“Insofar as the injury precipitated is anxious, this Court docket has authorized the plea of a single blow by hand being given on the pinnacle of the deceased. In our gaze, it’s a ways this significance which is an error apparent on the face of the checklist desiring some remedial action,” the apex court additional added, as per PTI stories.

The court additional seen that the blow used to be now not inflicted on an particular particular person identically bodily placed however on a 65-year-passe particular person, extra than double his age and Sidhu can not say that he did now not know the enact of the blow or plead lack of information on this aspect.

(With PTI inputs)

READ | 1988 twin carriageway rage case: Will Navjot Singh Sidhu be ready to contest polls in future?

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button